Teaching Tables are all-campus workshops that focus on shared readings and discuss specific topics that are of relevance to the entire Emory community. They are usually held during lunchtime in the Jones Room of the Woodruff Library. In the past, they have included such topics as “Civil Discourse and Diversity in the Classroom” and “Who Are Our Students? Millennial Learners, Net Geners, and New Learning Styles in the Classroom.”
Teaching Tables usually involve a follow-up or series of follow up workshops. They are smaller “lunch and learns” that focus on continuing discussion from an earlier Teaching Table. CFDE staff gathers the concerns that faculty have expressed in the initial workshop through survey data and informal feedback, and creates sessions specifically geared to those concerns. For example, the “Millennial Learners” workshop resulted in a five part year long “Teaching Table” series that focuses on various philosophical and practical elements of teaching with technology in the twenty first century classroom.
This is a five part series on the theory and practice of teaching with technology:
In this series of Teaching Tables, we are following up on a workshop we sponsored last year, based on case studies developed here at Emory. We learned from the workshop that civil discourse challenges are different in different arenas of intellectual inquiry. Based on this insight, we decided to design our Teaching Tables accordingly. For the 2009-2010 academic year, our Civil Discourse workshops are based on general fields of inquiry: health sciences, humanities, social sciences, business, law, and basic science.
In each of these arenas we have invited two or three professors to have a conversation about civil discourse in their fields, and a respondent from outside their field but familiar with its basic commitments and intellectual contours.
In other arenas, “civil discourse” might be called “courageous conversations” or “difficult dialogues” and these discussions may connect in some ways to conflict resolution and questions of hate speech, free speech, and academic freedom.
What we hope to accomplish with these workshops is to stimulate new ways of thinking about talking across difference. How do we “agree to disagree” about “hot-button” issues in our respective fields? Can we learn to co-exist in classrooms, labs, and offices with different opinions and avoid destructive coping mechanisms that undermine intellectual community?
Details to be announced soon.